Go to USC home page USC Logo School of Journalism and Mass Communications
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA



USC  THIS SITE

SJMC HOME PAGE

Read Archived Articles>>
No. 29 for June 2004

Common Sense Journalism

Questions answered

By Doug Fisher


As part of doing this column and other work with press associations, from time to time editors will call or write seeking help with this or that thorny issue of the moment or to settle those kinds of newsrooms arguments that can only break out over placement of a comma.

They are valuable reminders of the front-line questions we sometimes have to deal with, and so this month I thought I’d share a few of them with you:

Q. What is the proper way to print 2 1/2 years: Fudge it with 2.5 years? Write out two and one-half years, or 2 and one-half years, or 2 one-half years, or 2 1/2 years, or 2 and 1/2 years?

A. The generally used form is 2 1/2 years. Numbers that normally would be written out (it lasted two years) become all numerals in fraction form (it lasted 2 1/2 years). Though the AP advises using decimals when practical, the fraction form is preferred for things like durations and ages.

Q. What is the proper way to write out a time period (assuming that an event is entirely in the morning or entirely in the afternoon)? Example: The council will meet from 8 a.m. to 10 a.m. or
The council will meet from 8 to 10 a.m.

A. You would be OK with either. It’s a matter of house style. As long as there is no likelihood of confusion, I suggest dropping the first a.m. or p.m.

Q. Should we use a comma in place of “and” in this headline: Police arrest hit, run suspect?

A. The comma doesn’t work there. Some readers could be confused and parse it as two separate actions, arrest and run, with “hit” the fleeting object of “arrest.” This is a case where using the full form, hit-and-run, provide the clearest hed. However, in cases of a tight count, the hyphen can sometimes be used in place of the comma: Police arrest hit-run suspect. This doesn’t work with everything, though; rock-roll is kind of weird.

Q. Should I treat the word "also" as I would "only." For example, is the "also" in this sentence placed correctly? There are also balls, beanbags, hats and stick horses.

A. You are correct. Also can be used in many cases without the same placement problem that “only” poses. With transitive verbs: He also threw the ball is potentially different than he threw also the ball, but the latter is so awkward it is a candidate for a rewrite. Context usually makes this clear:
- He kicked the ball. Later on, he also threw it.
- He threw his bat, glove and spikes. He also threw the ball. Context makes this clear with no need to resort to an awkward he threw also the ball.

Q. The other day, I asked a desk colleague to change a headline to active voice and was told “active voice is overrated.” This person acknowledges being taught active voice in school but intimates there’s a new rule around. Is there any current journalism theory out there that says active voice is passé?

A. Active voice is never overrated. It's a misreading of the teaching, which is to use active voice whenever possible, but understand why you are breaking that to go passive. Not only does no journalism theory I’m aware of say active voice is passé, with the Web there is even more push for subject-verb-object active writing. However, one can be pedantic about this. There certainly can be a time for passive voice in a headline like “Stewart found guilty.”

Stewart is the recognizable name in the news and needs to lead the hed. We could write "Jury finds Stewart guilty," but why bury the name? And maybe we don’t have the space. It also depends on emphasis. While we could write: The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday outlawed smoking, smoking is the more powerful lede element: Smoking was outlawed by the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday.

Many times passive is preferred in crime stories because the name or rank of those involved is more recognizable: Mayor John Doe was charged Tuesday with fraud ... is stronger than Police charged Mayor John Doe on Tuesday with fraud. (And where do we put that day of the week so that it doesn’t sound awkward?)

About 20 percent of the headlines in even the best papers are passive. But that's a bow to reality, not a recasting of the emphasis on active whenever possible.

Doug Fisher, a former AP news editor, teaches journalism at the University of South Carolina and can be reached at dfisher@sc.edu or 803-777-3315.

 

 

RETURN TO TOP
USC LINKS: DIRECTORY MAP EVENTS VIP
SITE INFORMATION